Wootton Trucks Ltd & Anor v Man ERF UK Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 1042 (19 July 2006)
The express provision for termination on notice in the Interim Agreement took effect according to its terms; MAN ERF's notice was valid and effective to terminate the agreement. There was no legal basis for implying or substituting a two-year notice period, nor for granting interim relief.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 1042
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Wootton Trucks Ltd; Claimant/respondent: Wootton Trucks (Reading) Ltd; Defendant/appellant: MAN ERF UK Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From High Court Chancery Division / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Termination of Contract, Block Exemption Regulations, Notice Period, Severance of Contract Terms
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wootton Trucks Ltd
Claimant/respondent
Wootton Trucks (Reading) Ltd
Claimant/respondent
MAN ERF UK Ltd
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From High Court Chancery Division / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Interim Agreement was validly terminated by notice
- 2 Whether the notice provision conflicted with European competition law
- 3 Whether a two-year notice period should be implied or substituted
Ratio Decidendi
The express provision for termination on notice in the Interim Agreement took effect according to its terms; MAN ERF's notice was valid and effective to terminate the agreement. There was no legal basis for implying or substituting a two-year notice period, nor for granting interim relief.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Application for interim relief refused
- Permission granted for late service of Respondent's Notice
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment