Hughes v Pritchard & Ors [2021] EWHC 1580 (Ch) (11 June 2021)
The 2016 will of Evan Hughes is invalid due to lack of testamentary capacity at the time of execution. The evidence established that by 7 July 2016, Evan Hughes did not have the capacity to appreciate the longstanding family understanding regarding the disposition of Yr Efail, to understand the extent of the property, or to comprehend the significance of the changes made in the 2016 will. The burden of proof on capacity was not discharged by the claimant. As a result, the 2016 will is set aside and the estate falls to be distributed under the previous valid will.
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC 1580
- Parties
- Claimant: Gareth Hughes; First Defendant: Carys Pritchard; Second Defendant: Gwen Hughes; Third Defendant: Stephen Hughes
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 June 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Probate/contested Will / High Court Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- 2016 will declared invalid for lack of testamentary capacity; estate to be distributed under previous valid will.
- Legal Topics
- Testamentary Capacity, Knowledge and Approval, Undue Influence, Proprietary Estoppel
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gareth Hughes
Claimant
Carys Pritchard
First Defendant
Gwen Hughes
Second Defendant
Stephen Hughes
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate/contested Will / High Court Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2016 will of Evan Hughes is valid given allegations of lack of testamentary capacity, want of knowledge and approval, and/or undue influence; whether proprietary estoppel applies to Yr Efail farmland.
Ratio Decidendi
The 2016 will of Evan Hughes is invalid due to lack of testamentary capacity at the time of execution. The evidence established that by 7 July 2016, Evan Hughes did not have the capacity to appreciate the longstanding family understanding regarding the disposition of Yr Efail, to understand the extent of the property, or to comprehend the significance of the changes made in the 2016 will. The burden of proof on capacity was not discharged by the claimant. As a result, the 2016 will is set aside and the estate falls to be distributed under the previous valid will.
Court Disposition
2016 will declared invalid for lack of testamentary capacity; estate to be distributed under previous valid will.
Orders
- 2016 will set aside as invalid.
- Probate to be granted in respect of the 2005 will.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment