Richards & Anor v Morgan [2001] EWCA Civ 1592 (18 October, 2001)
The absence of judicial reasoning and apparent failure to consider the defendant's evidence or hold a hearing in contentious probate proceedings constituted a procedural irregularity; the matter should be remitted for proper consideration.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 1592
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Neil Aston Richards; Claimant/respondent: David Geoffrey Lewis; Defendant/applicant: Anthony Ernest Briant Morgan
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Probate Proceedings (contentious) / Application for Permission to Appeal (court of Appeal)
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal adjourned for on notice hearing; appeal to follow if permission granted.
- Legal Topics
- Testamentary Capacity, Admission of Will to Probate, Procedural Fairness, Summary Judgment in Probate, Default Judgment in Probate
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Neil Aston Richards
Claimant/respondent
David Geoffrey Lewis
Claimant/respondent
Anthony Ernest Briant Morgan
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Probate Proceedings (contentious) / Application for Permission to Appeal (court of Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the will of 22 June 1994 should be admitted to probate in solemn form
- 2 Whether the judge erred by proceeding without considering the defendant's evidence or holding a hearing
- 3 Whether procedural requirements under the Civil Procedure Rules for contentious probate were followed
Ratio Decidendi
The absence of judicial reasoning and apparent failure to consider the defendant's evidence or hold a hearing in contentious probate proceedings constituted a procedural irregularity; the matter should be remitted for proper consideration.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal adjourned for on notice hearing; appeal to follow if permission granted.
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal adjourned to an on notice hearing before a two-judge court with a time estimate of one hour.
- If permission is granted, the appeal will be heard immediately thereafter.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment