Petkar & Anor, R. v
Although there were misdirections in the section 34 direction and failure to give a Jones and Jenkins warning, the evidence against both appellants was overwhelming and the convictions are safe. The new evidence regarding Petkar's accounts did not affect the safety of the conviction. Petkar's sentence was reduced by six months due to delay not of his own making.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Appellant/defendant: Rafiq Petkar; Appellant/defendant: Martin Farquhar
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeals against conviction dismissed; Petkar's appeal against sentence allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Theft, Duress, Adverse Inference, Evidence, Appeal Procedure, Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Rafiq Petkar
Appellant/defendant
Martin Farquhar
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge's section 34 direction on adverse inferences was defective and amounted to a misdirection
- 2 Whether the judge failed to give an appropriate warning regarding the evidence of co-defendants (cut-throat defence)
- 3 Whether the introduction of Mrs Wells' statement was improperly characterised
Ratio Decidendi
Although there were misdirections in the section 34 direction and failure to give a Jones and Jenkins warning, the evidence against both appellants was overwhelming and the convictions are safe. The new evidence regarding Petkar's accounts did not affect the safety of the conviction. Petkar's sentence was reduced by six months due to delay not of his own making.
Court Disposition
Appeals against conviction dismissed; Petkar's appeal against sentence allowed in part
Orders
- Convictions of Rafiq Petkar and Martin Farquhar upheld
- Petkar's sentence reduced from 5 years to 4 years and 6 months imprisonment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment