Kier Regional Ltd (t/a Wallis) v City & General (Holborn) Ltd & Ors
No present debt exists from Cambridge or Temple to Holborn as profit/loss shares under the joint venture agreement are not payable until after final account resolution; entries in company accounts do not override the contractual position. Even if a debt existed, the court would not exercise its discretion to make final third party debt orders due to prejudice to third parties and imminent arbitration challenging the underlying judgment.
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Kier Regional Limited (t/a Wallis); Defendant/respondent: City and General (Holborn) Ltd; Third Party: Cambridge Gate Properties Limited; Third Party: Temple Guiting Manor Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Ruling on Final Third Party Debt Orders and Stay of Execution
- Outcome
- Applications for final third party debt orders dismissed; interim orders discharged; stay of execution granted.
- Legal Topics
- Third Party Debt Orders, Enforcement of Adjudicator's Decision, Stay of Execution, Joint Venture Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kier Regional Limited (t/a Wallis)
Claimant/applicant
City and General (Holborn) Ltd
Defendant/respondent
Cambridge Gate Properties Limited
Third Party
Temple Guiting Manor Limited
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Application / Ruling on Final Third Party Debt Orders and Stay of Execution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether debts are due and owing from Cambridge and Temple to Holborn
- 2 Whether the court should exercise its discretion under CPR Part 72 to make final third party debt orders
- 3 Whether a stay of execution should be granted pending arbitration
Ratio Decidendi
No present debt exists from Cambridge or Temple to Holborn as profit/loss shares under the joint venture agreement are not payable until after final account resolution; entries in company accounts do not override the contractual position. Even if a debt existed, the court would not exercise its discretion to make final third party debt orders due to prejudice to third parties and imminent arbitration challenging the underlying judgment.
Court Disposition
Applications for final third party debt orders dismissed; interim orders discharged; stay of execution granted.
Orders
- No final third party debt orders to be made.
- Interim third party debt orders discharged.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment