Derrin Brothers Properties Ltd & Ors, R (on the application of) v A Judge of the First Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) & Ors
The requirements of Schedule 36 to the Finance Act 2008 were properly satisfied; only three appellants were correctly treated as 'taxpayers' and received adequate and timely reasons. The process, including judicial monitoring and judicial review, provided sufficient safeguards and did not breach Article 6 or Article 8 ECHR rights. The appeal is dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellants: Derrin Brothers Properties Ltd & Others; First Respondent: A Judge of the First Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber); Second Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs; Interested Parties: HSBC Bank plc; Interested Parties: Lubbock Fine LLP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 January 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Appeal / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Third Party Information Notices, Judicial Review, Article 6 ECHR (right to Fair Trial), Article 8 ECHR (right to Private Life), Double Taxation Convention, Schedule 36 Finance Act 2008
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Derrin Brothers Properties Ltd & Others
Appellants
A Judge of the First Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)
First Respondent
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Second Respondents
HSBC Bank plc
Interested Parties
Lubbock Fine LLP
Interested Parties
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the requirements of Schedule 36 to the Finance Act 2008 were breached in issuing third party notices for tax information
- 2 Whether the process breached Article 6 and/or Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights
- 3 Whether all appellants should have been treated as 'taxpayers' for the purposes of Schedule 36
Ratio Decidendi
The requirements of Schedule 36 to the Finance Act 2008 were properly satisfied; only three appellants were correctly treated as 'taxpayers' and received adequate and timely reasons. The process, including judicial monitoring and judicial review, provided sufficient safeguards and did not breach Article 6 or Article 8 ECHR rights. The appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment