Centrehigh Ltd v Kare Amen & Ors [2013] EWHC 625 (Ch) (08 March 2013)
The court determined that the application for cross-examination of defendants' witnesses should be dismissed, as the case remains appropriate for summary disposal based on extensive documentary evidence and witness statements, and does not warrant a full trial of disputed factual matters in the context of a s.51 application.
- Citation
- [2013] EWHC 625 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Centrehigh Limited; Fourth Defendant: Joint Funding Partners Limited; Fifth Defendant: Telstar Music Group Limited; Defendants: Karen Amen & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Third Party Costs Application / Pre Trial Review
- Outcome
- Application for cross-examination dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Third Party Costs Orders, Summary Procedure, Cross Examination, Disclosure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Centrehigh Limited
Claimant
Joint Funding Partners Limited
Fourth Defendant
Telstar Music Group Limited
Fifth Defendant
Karen Amen & Ors.
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Third Party Costs Application / Pre Trial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimants should be permitted to cross-examine defendants' witnesses in a s.51 application
- 2 Appropriate procedure for determination of third party costs order under s.51 Senior Courts Act 1981
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that the application for cross-examination of defendants' witnesses should be dismissed, as the case remains appropriate for summary disposal based on extensive documentary evidence and witness statements, and does not warrant a full trial of disputed factual matters in the context of a s.51 application.
Court Disposition
Application for cross-examination dismissed
Orders
- Claimants permitted to serve witness summary for Mr. Dixon
- Time for further evidence by claimants extended to 4.30pm on 11 March 2013
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment