HSBC Bank PLC v Chevalier-Firescu [2024] EWCA Civ 1550 (11 December 2024)

HSBC Bank PLC v Chevalier-Firescu [2024] EWCA Civ 1550 (11 December 2024)

The Employment Tribunal failed to adequately explain its reasoning for refusing to extend time for Mrs Chevalier-Firescu's claims, particularly regarding her knowledge of discriminatory acts and the impact of late disclosure. The EAT correctly identified an error of principle in the ET's approach. The ET also failed...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] EWCA Civ 1550
Parties
Appellant/respondent: HSBC Bank plc; Respondent/claimant: Carmen Chevalier-Firescu
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 December 2024
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Time Limits for Discrimination Claims, Extension of Time, Victimisation, Sex Discrimination, Race Discrimination, Jurisdiction of Employment Tribunal
Employment Law Equality Law Time Limits for Discrimination Claims Extension of Time Victimisation Sex Discrimination Race Discrimination Jurisdiction of Employment Tribunal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

HSBC Bank plc

Appellant/respondent

Carmen Chevalier-Firescu

Respondent/claimant

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal adequately explained its reasons for refusing to extend time for bringing discrimination claims
  2. 2 Whether the ET erred in striking out the race discrimination claim
  3. 3 Whether the ET properly considered the impact of late disclosure and personal circumstances on time limits

Ratio Decidendi

The Employment Tribunal failed to adequately explain its reasoning for refusing to extend time for Mrs Chevalier-Firescu's claims, particularly regarding her knowledge of discriminatory acts and the impact of late disclosure. The EAT correctly identified an error of principle in the ET's approach. The ET also failed to adjudicate separately on the race discrimination claim, which was brought in time.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • EAT's order allowing appeal and remitting aspects to ET upheld
  • ET's refusal to extend time and strike out of race discrimination claim set aside