Staffordshire County Council v Sherratt & Anor [2019] EWHC 1416 (Admin) (28 February 2019)
The extended time limit for prosecution under section 31 of the Animal Welfare Act 2006 does not apply to offences under the Welfare of Farmed Animals (England) Regulations 2007 because there is no express statutory provision to that effect. The default six-month time limit in section 127 of the Magistrates' Court Act 1980 applies.
- Citation
- [2019] EWHC 1416 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Staffordshire County Council; Defendant/appellant: Sherratt; Defendant/appellant: Sigley
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Divisional Court Judgment on Appeal From Magistrates' Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Time Limits for Prosecution, Interpretation of Delegated Legislation, Animal Welfare Act 2006, Welfare of Farmed Animals (england) Regulations 2007
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Staffordshire County Council
Claimant/respondent
Sherratt
Defendant/appellant
Sigley
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Divisional Court Judgment on Appeal From Magistrates' Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the extended time limit for prosecution under section 31 of the Animal Welfare Act 2006 applies to offences under the Welfare of Farmed Animals (England) Regulations 2007
- 2 Whether offences under the 2007 Regulations are 'offences under the Act' for the purposes of section 31
Ratio Decidendi
The extended time limit for prosecution under section 31 of the Animal Welfare Act 2006 does not apply to offences under the Welfare of Farmed Animals (England) Regulations 2007 because there is no express statutory provision to that effect. The default six-month time limit in section 127 of the Magistrates' Court Act 1980 applies.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The question posed by the case stated is answered in the affirmative: the District Judge was correct to apply the six-month time limit under section 127 of the Magistrates' Court Act 1980 to offences under the 2007 Regulations.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment