West v First Secretary of State & Anor
The inspector properly considered both actual and policy harm to the Green Belt, assessed the claimant's circumstances individually and collectively, and was entitled to decide the case on the material before him without further inquiry. There was no procedural unfairness or breach of Article 6 ECHR.
- Parties
- Claimant: Sandi Pauline West; First Defendant: First Secretary of State; Second Defendant: Rochford District Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (planning) / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Town and Country Planning, Green Belt Policy, Procedural Fairness, Article 6 ECHR, Article 8 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sandi Pauline West
Claimant
First Secretary of State
First Defendant
Rochford District Council
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (planning) / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the inspector failed to consider actual harm to the Green Belt beyond policy harm
- 2 Whether the inspector failed to consider the cumulative effect of the claimant's circumstances as very special circumstances
- 3 Whether the inspector was required to make further inquiry under the written representations procedure for fairness or under Article 6 ECHR
Ratio Decidendi
The inspector properly considered both actual and policy harm to the Green Belt, assessed the claimant's circumstances individually and collectively, and was entitled to decide the case on the material before him without further inquiry. There was no procedural unfairness or breach of Article 6 ECHR.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment