Fox Land and Property Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor
The Secretary of State was entitled to conclude that the Green Belt policies remained in force, acted within the bounds of fairness and rationality, had evidential support for his conclusions, and did not err in law or act irrationally in refusing planning permission. The application to quash the decision is dismissed.
- Parties
- Claimant: Fox Land and Property Limited; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Defendant: Castle Point Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment on Application to Quash Planning Decision
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Town and Country Planning, Green Belt Policy, Judicial Review, Natural Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fox Land and Property Limited
Claimant
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
First Defendant
Castle Point Borough Council
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment on Application to Quash Planning Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the lapse of Policy GB1 meant there was no Green Belt policy in Castle Point
- 2 Whether the Secretary of State acted unfairly by not disclosing post-inquiry representations
- 3 Whether the Secretary of State had a sufficient evidential basis to disagree with the inspector's findings
Ratio Decidendi
The Secretary of State was entitled to conclude that the Green Belt policies remained in force, acted within the bounds of fairness and rationality, had evidential support for his conclusions, and did not err in law or act irrationally in refusing planning permission. The application to quash the decision is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment