AGA Rangemaster Group Ltd v UK Innovations Group Ltd & Anor [2024] EWHC 1727 (IPEC) (08 July 2024)
The defendants infringed the claimant's registered trade marks by marketing and selling retrofitted AGA cookers in a manner likely to give the impression of a commercial connection with the claimant, thereby giving the claimant legitimate reasons to oppose further dealings and defeating the exhaustion defence. The use of the AGA marks was not descriptive or in accordance with honest practices. The claimant's marks had reputation and distinctive character. The defendants also infringed the claimant's copyright in the control panel design drawing, as copyright subsisted and was copied. The 2D and 3D AGA marks were valid and infringed.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 1727 (IPEC)
- Parties
- Claimant: AGA Rangemaster Group Limited; First Defendant: UK Innovations Group Limited; Second Defendant: Michael Patrick McGinley
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Intellectual Property (trade Mark and Copyright) Infringement Claim / First Instance Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part; trade mark and copyright infringement found; counterclaim for invalidity dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Trade Mark Infringement, Copyright Infringement, Exhaustion of Rights, Aftermarket Goods, Refurbishment and Conversion, Likelihood of Confusion, Reputation and Distinctive Character, Joint Tortfeasance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AGA Rangemaster Group Limited
Claimant
UK Innovations Group Limited
First Defendant
Michael Patrick McGinley
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Intellectual Property (trade Mark and Copyright) Infringement Claim / First Instance Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants infringed the claimant's registered trade marks by marketing and selling retrofitted AGA cookers with the eControl System
- 2 Whether the defendants infringed the claimant's copyright in the design drawing for the control panel
- 3 Whether the exhaustion of rights defence under s.12 of the Trade Marks Act 1994 applies
Ratio Decidendi
The defendants infringed the claimant's registered trade marks by marketing and selling retrofitted AGA cookers in a manner likely to give the impression of a commercial connection with the claimant, thereby giving the claimant legitimate reasons to oppose further dealings and defeating the exhaustion defence. The use of the AGA marks was not descriptive or in accordance with honest practices. The claimant's marks had reputation and distinctive character. The defendants also infringed the claimant's copyright in the control panel design drawing, as copyright subsisted and was copied. The 2D and 3D AGA marks were valid and infringed.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part; trade mark and copyright infringement found; counterclaim for invalidity dismissed.
Orders
- Declaration of trade mark infringement against both defendants
- Declaration of copyright infringement against both defendants
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment