Red Bull GmbH v Big Horn UK Ltd & Ors
Big Horn’s use of signs visually and conceptually similar to Red Bull’s trade marks on identical goods took unfair advantage of the distinctive character and reputation of Red Bull’s marks, constituting infringement under Article 9(2)(c) EUTMR. Mr Enchev, as the sole director and controlling mind of Big Horn, is jointly liable as a tortfeasor.
- Parties
- Claimant: Red Bull GmbH; First Defendant: Big Horn UK Limited; Second Defendant: Voltino EOOD; Third Defendant: Lyubomir Enchev
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Intellectual Property Trade Mark Infringement / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Trade Mark Infringement, Joint Tortfeasorship, EU Trade Mark Regulation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Red Bull GmbH
Claimant
Big Horn UK Limited
First Defendant
Voltino EOOD
Second Defendant
Lyubomir Enchev
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Intellectual Property Trade Mark Infringement / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the disputed Big Horn signs are similar to Red Bull trade marks and give rise to a likelihood of confusion under Article 9(2)(b) EUTMR
- 2 Whether the disputed signs take unfair advantage of the distinctive character or reputation of Red Bull trade marks under Article 9(2)(c) EUTMR
- 3 Whether Mr Enchev is personally liable as a joint tortfeasor
Ratio Decidendi
Big Horn’s use of signs visually and conceptually similar to Red Bull’s trade marks on identical goods took unfair advantage of the distinctive character and reputation of Red Bull’s marks, constituting infringement under Article 9(2)(c) EUTMR. Mr Enchev, as the sole director and controlling mind of Big Horn, is jointly liable as a tortfeasor.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed
Orders
- Declaration of infringement under Article 9(2)(c) EUTMR and Regulation 207/2009 as amended
- Permission to amend Particulars of Claim to refer to Regulation 207/2009 as amended
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment