Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB [2024] EWCA Civ 1453 (29 November 2024)
The Court held that 'designation' in the relevant Regulation includes trade marks and that the use of 'milk' in the trade mark POST MILK GENERATION for oat-based, non-dairy products is prohibited by Article 78(2) and Annex VII, Part III, point 5 of Regulation 1308/2013/EU. The exceptions in point 5 did not apply as POST MILK GENERATION is not a designation clearly used to describe a characteristic quality of the goods, nor is it a product listed in the 2010 Decision. The appeal was allowed and the hearing officer's declaration of invalidity reinstated.
- Citation
- [2024] EWCA Civ 1453
- Parties
- Applicant/appellant: Dairy UK Limited; Proprietor/respondent: Oatly AB
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Trade Mark Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) on Second Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; declaration of invalidity reinstated.
- Legal Topics
- Trade Marks, Deceptive Marks, Regulation of Food Labelling, Interpretation of EU Regulations, Marketing Standards for Agricultural Products
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dairy UK Limited
Applicant/appellant
Oatly AB
Proprietor/respondent
Procedural Posture
Trade Mark Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) on Second Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the term 'designation' in Article 78(2) and Annex VII, Part III of Regulation 1308/2013/EU includes trade marks such that the use of 'milk' in the trade mark POST MILK GENERATION is prohibited for non-dairy products.
- 2 Whether the use of the trade mark POST MILK GENERATION is permitted under the exceptions in Annex VII, Part III, point 5 of Regulation 1308/2013/EU.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that 'designation' in the relevant Regulation includes trade marks and that the use of 'milk' in the trade mark POST MILK GENERATION for oat-based, non-dairy products is prohibited by Article 78(2) and Annex VII, Part III, point 5 of Regulation 1308/2013/EU. The exceptions in point 5 did not apply as POST MILK GENERATION is not a designation clearly used to describe a characteristic quality of the goods, nor is it a product listed in the 2010 Decision. The appeal was allowed and the hearing officer's declaration of invalidity reinstated.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; declaration of invalidity reinstated.
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The hearing officer's declaration of invalidity in respect of Classes 29, 30, and 32 is reinstated.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment