Fields v Klaus Kobec Ltd & Anor
The court found that Mr Cohen and KKL infringed Mr Fields' registered trade marks by continuing to use the 'klauskobec.com' domain name and threatening to use the mark after consent was withdrawn on 25 December 2004. The 'own name' defence applied to use of the company name and on watch backplates due to contractual requirements with football clubs, but not to the continued use of the domain name. The statutory defence of earlier right failed as KKL/KKIL had not established sufficient goodwill at the relevant dates. The registrations were not invalid as there was no bad faith or earlier right established. The counterclaim for invalidity was dismissed.
- Parties
- Claimant: Antoni Fields; First Defendant: Klaus Kobec Limited; Second Defendant: Michael Cohen
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Intellectual Property / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim partially allowed; counterclaim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Trade Marks, Passing Off, Infringement, Statutory Defences, Bad Faith Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Antoni Fields
Claimant
Klaus Kobec Limited
First Defendant
Michael Cohen
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Intellectual Property / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants infringed the claimant's registered trade marks for 'KLAUS KOBEC'
- 2 Whether statutory defences (earlier right, own name) apply to the alleged infringements
- 3 Whether the registrations of the trade marks are invalid on relative or absolute grounds (bad faith)
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Mr Cohen and KKL infringed Mr Fields' registered trade marks by continuing to use the 'klauskobec.com' domain name and threatening to use the mark after consent was withdrawn on 25 December 2004. The 'own name' defence applied to use of the company name and on watch backplates due to contractual requirements with football clubs, but not to the continued use of the domain name. The statutory defence of earlier right failed as KKL/KKIL had not established sufficient goodwill at the relevant dates. The registrations were not invalid as there was no bad faith or earlier right established. The counterclaim for invalidity was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Claim partially allowed; counterclaim dismissed
Orders
- Declaration of infringement in respect of use of 'klauskobec.com' domain name and threats to use the mark after 25 December 2004
- Statutory defences upheld for use of company name and on watch backplates
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment