Birlea Furniture Ltd v Platinum Enterprise (UK) Ltd & Anor
The First Defendant used the Birlea mark in the course of trade on Amazon listings from the outset, and the Second Defendant actively co-operated in the commission of the infringing acts, making both jointly liable for trade mark infringement.
- Parties
- Claimant: Birlea Furniture Limited; First Defendant: Platinum Enterprise (UK) Limited; Second Defendant: Mr Mohammed Raheel Baig
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 January 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Trade Mark Infringement Claim / Liability Judgment
- Outcome
- Liability established against both Defendants for trade mark infringement.
- Legal Topics
- Trade Mark Infringement, Joint Tortfeasance, Online Marketplace Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Birlea Furniture Limited
Claimant
Platinum Enterprise (UK) Limited
First Defendant
Mr Mohammed Raheel Baig
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Trade Mark Infringement Claim / Liability Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the First Defendant used the Birlea mark in the course of trade on Amazon listings
- 2 Whether the Second Defendant is jointly liable as a joint tortfeasor
Ratio Decidendi
The First Defendant used the Birlea mark in the course of trade on Amazon listings from the outset, and the Second Defendant actively co-operated in the commission of the infringing acts, making both jointly liable for trade mark infringement.
Court Disposition
Liability established against both Defendants for trade mark infringement.
Orders
- First Defendant liable for infringement of the Mark under Article 9(1)(a)/Article 9(2)(a) of the 2009 EUTMR/EUTMR from 23 April 2013 onwards.
- Second Defendant jointly liable as joint tortfeasor.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment