Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC & Ors
The court held that declaratory relief identifying specific breaches of the 2020 order was appropriate and useful, given the complexity and ongoing disputes between the parties. Applying strict construction to the order and its exceptions, the court found that some uses of 'Merck' by the Defendants (notably generic email addresses, certain online materials, and links to Merck-branded content) constituted breaches of the order, as they were targeted at the UK and not excused by exceptions such as inadvertent error or permitted use by employees outside the UK. Other alleged breaches were not established, either because the use was not targeted at the UK, fell within an exception, or did not...
- Parties
- Claimant: Merck KGaA; First Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC (formerly Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp); Second Defendant: Merck & Co. Inc; Third Defendant: Organon Pharma (UK) Limited (formerly Merck Sharp & Dohme Limited); Fourth Defendant: MSD Animal Health UK Limited (formerly Intervet UK Limited); Fifth Defendant: Intervet International B.V.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Declaratory Relief (post Judgment Enforcement) / Judgment on Application for Declarations of Breach of Order
- Outcome
- Application succeeded in part; declarations of breach granted in respect of some, but not all, alleged breaches.
- Legal Topics
- Trade Mark Infringement, Breach of Contract, Declaratory Relief, Construction of Court Orders, Targeting in Online IP Infringement, Burden of Proof in Civil Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Merck KGaA
Claimant
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC (formerly Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp)
First Defendant
Merck & Co. Inc
Second Defendant
Organon Pharma (UK) Limited (formerly Merck Sharp & Dohme Limited)
Third Defendant
MSD Animal Health UK Limited (formerly Intervet UK Limited)
Fourth Defendant
Intervet International B.V.
Fifth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Declaratory Relief (post Judgment Enforcement) / Judgment on Application for Declarations of Breach of Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the First, Second, and Fifth Defendants breached the order of 28 July 2020 by infringing trade marks and/or breaching contract regarding use of 'Merck' in the UK;
- 2 Whether declaratory relief should be granted identifying specific breaches;
- 3 How exceptions and carve-outs in the order (notably inadvertent error and permitted uses) apply;
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that declaratory relief identifying specific breaches of the 2020 order was appropriate and useful, given the complexity and ongoing disputes between the parties. Applying strict construction to the order and its exceptions, the court found that some uses of 'Merck' by the Defendants (notably generic email addresses, certain online materials, and links to Merck-branded content) constituted breaches of the order, as they were targeted at the UK and not excused by exceptions such as inadvertent error or permitted use by employees outside the UK. Other alleged breaches were not established, either because the use was not targeted at the UK, fell within an exception, or did not...
Court Disposition
Application succeeded in part; declarations of breach granted in respect of some, but not all, alleged breaches.
Orders
- Declarations that the First Defendant (and, in some cases, the Second Defendant) breached Paragraphs 2 and/or 3 of the 28 July 2020 order in respect of specified uses of 'Merck' as set out in the judgment's summary table.
- Declarations that other alleged breaches were not established.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment