Bayerische Motoren Werke AG v Premier Alloy Wheels (UK) Ltd & Ors
D3, D1, and D2 infringed BMW's trade marks, committed passing off, and infringed registered Community designs. D2 also breached contract. D4 and D5, though not direct infringers, provided more than trivial assistance to D3's infringing acts pursuant to a common design and are jointly liable for those acts (D4 only until 2 September 2017). The evidence did not justify injunctive relief beyond the six RCDs where infringement was proven.
- Parties
- Claimant: Bayerische Motoren Werke AG; First Defendant: Premier Alloy Wheels (UK) Limited; Second Defendant: Devon Thompson; Third Defendant: DGT Wheels and Tyres Limited; Fourth Defendant: Jerome David Layzell; Fifth Defendant: David Layzell
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Intellectual Property Infringement (trade Marks, Passing Off, Registered Designs, Breach of Contract) / Judgment After Remote Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimant on all claims against D1, D2, D3; partial liability for D4 and D5; counterclaim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Trade Mark Infringement, Passing Off, Registered Community Design Infringement, Accessory Liability, Breach of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
Claimant
Premier Alloy Wheels (UK) Limited
First Defendant
Devon Thompson
Second Defendant
DGT Wheels and Tyres Limited
Third Defendant
Jerome David Layzell
Fourth Defendant
David Layzell
Fifth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Intellectual Property Infringement (trade Marks, Passing Off, Registered Designs, Breach of Contract) / Judgment After Remote Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants infringed BMW's registered trade marks and Community designs
- 2 Whether the defendants committed passing off
- 3 Whether D4 and D5 are personally liable for acts of D3
Ratio Decidendi
D3, D1, and D2 infringed BMW's trade marks, committed passing off, and infringed registered Community designs. D2 also breached contract. D4 and D5, though not direct infringers, provided more than trivial assistance to D3's infringing acts pursuant to a common design and are jointly liable for those acts (D4 only until 2 September 2017). The evidence did not justify injunctive relief beyond the six RCDs where infringement was proven.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimant on all claims against D1, D2, D3; partial liability for D4 and D5; counterclaim dismissed.
Orders
- Injunctions granted against D1, D2, D3, D4 (until 2 September 2017), and D5 for trade mark, passing off, and RCD infringement limited to six specified RCDs.
- Declaration of breach of contract against D2.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment