Comic Enterprises Ltd v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
Section 41 of the Trade Marks Act 1994, properly interpreted, is compatible with Directive 2008/95/EC. Registration of a series of trade marks is not the registration of a single trade mark consisting of multiple signs, but rather a bundle of individual trade marks, each of which must satisfy the requirements of the Act and the Directive. The system does not contravene EU law, and the registration is not liable to be declared invalid on this ground.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Comic Enterprises Ltd; Defendant/appellant: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation; Interested Party: Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Trade Mark Registration, Series of Trade Marks, Compatibility With EU Law, Graphical Representation, Directive 2008/95/ec, Trade Marks Act 1994 Section 41
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Comic Enterprises Ltd
Claimant/respondent
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
Defendant/appellant
Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 41 of the Trade Marks Act 1994 (registration of a series of trade marks) is compatible with Directive 2008/95/EC and EU law requirements for trade marks to be a single sign capable of graphical representation
- 2 Whether the registration of a series of trade marks is liable to be declared invalid under section 47 of the Trade Marks Act 1994
Ratio Decidendi
Section 41 of the Trade Marks Act 1994, properly interpreted, is compatible with Directive 2008/95/EC. Registration of a series of trade marks is not the registration of a single trade mark consisting of multiple signs, but rather a bundle of individual trade marks, each of which must satisfy the requirements of the Act and the Directive. The system does not contravene EU law, and the registration is not liable to be declared invalid on this ground.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Permission to amend defence and counterclaim granted to Fox
- No declaration of invalidity; registration stands
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment