Invest Bank PSC v El-Husseini & Ors [2024] EWHC 2976 (Comm) (21 November 2024)
The Bank failed to plead and prove that Ahmad transferred assets with the subjective purpose of putting them beyond the reach of the Bank as creditor for the relevant transactions, particularly regarding Commodore UAE's financial difficulties in late 2016/early 2017. The Bank's inferential case was not supported by cogent evidence or clear pleading as required under section 423. Relief under section 423 is refused.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 2976 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: Invest Bank P. S. C; First Defendant: Ahmad Mohammed El-Husseini; Second Defendant: Mohammed Ahmad El-Husseiny; Third Defendant: Alexander Ahmad El-Husseiny; Fourth Defendant: Ziad Ahmad El-Husseiny; Fifth Defendant: Ramzy Ahmad El-Husseiny; Sixth Defendant: Joan Eva Henry; Seventh Defendant: Virtue Trustees (Switzerland) A. G.; Eighth Defendant: Global Green Development Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Claim Under Section 423 Insolvency Act 1986 / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Transactions at Undervalue, Fraudulent Transfers, Freezing Orders, Personal Guarantees, Creditor Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Invest Bank P. S. C
Claimant
Ahmad Mohammed El-Husseini
First Defendant
Mohammed Ahmad El-Husseiny
Second Defendant
Alexander Ahmad El-Husseiny
Third Defendant
Ziad Ahmad El-Husseiny
Fourth Defendant
Ramzy Ahmad El-Husseiny
Fifth Defendant
Joan Eva Henry
Sixth Defendant
Virtue Trustees (Switzerland) A. G.
Seventh Defendant
Global Green Development Limited
Eighth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Claim Under Section 423 Insolvency Act 1986 / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Ahmad El-Husseini transferred assets for the purpose of putting them beyond the reach of creditors under section 423 Insolvency Act 1986
- 2 Whether the Bank's pleaded case supports relief under section 423
- 3 Whether the asset transfers were at an undervalue
Ratio Decidendi
The Bank failed to plead and prove that Ahmad transferred assets with the subjective purpose of putting them beyond the reach of the Bank as creditor for the relevant transactions, particularly regarding Commodore UAE's financial difficulties in late 2016/early 2017. The Bank's inferential case was not supported by cogent evidence or clear pleading as required under section 423. Relief under section 423 is refused.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- No relief granted under section 423 Insolvency Act 1986
- No reversal of asset transfers
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment