Johnson v Bank of Scotland Plc [2023] EWHC 169 (Ch) (30 January 2023)
The claimant failed to demonstrate that provision of a transcript of the whole hearing at public expense was necessary in the interests of justice; the judgment transcript alone suffices for the appeal, and the claimant's reasons were unsubstantiated, vague, or irrelevant.
- Citation
- [2023] EWHC 169 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Tom Johnson; Defendant/respondent: Bank of Scotland PLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Chancery Appeal / Application for Transcript at Public Expense Pending Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for transcript of whole hearing at public expense refused; judgment transcript at public expense already ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Transcripts at Public Expense, Appeals, Striking Out Claims, Fee Remission, Interests of Justice, Costs Capping
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tom Johnson
Claimant/appellant
Bank of Scotland PLC
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Chancery Appeal / Application for Transcript at Public Expense Pending Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a transcript of the whole hearing should be provided at public expense under CPR 52.14 for the purposes of an appeal
- 2 Whether the claimant's circumstances justify such an order
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant failed to demonstrate that provision of a transcript of the whole hearing at public expense was necessary in the interests of justice; the judgment transcript alone suffices for the appeal, and the claimant's reasons were unsubstantiated, vague, or irrelevant.
Court Disposition
Application for transcript of whole hearing at public expense refused; judgment transcript at public expense already ordered.
Orders
- Claimant to proceed with obtaining judgment transcript at public expense.
- If claimant wishes to commission full transcript privately, it must be lodged by 4 pm on 27 February 2023.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment