D, E, F and G (Children : Art 15 - transfer of the proceedings) [2017] EWFC B82 (19 September 2017)
The court held that the criteria for transfer under Article 15 were not met as the English court was best placed to determine the issues and transfer would not be in the best interests of the children.
- Citation
- [2017] EWFC B82
- Parties
- Child: D; Child: E; Child: F; Child: G
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 September 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Children Proceedings / Application for Transfer of Proceedings Under Article 15
- Outcome
- application for transfer refused
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Proceedings, Article 15 Brussels II Revised, Jurisdiction in Child Cases
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
D
Child
E
Child
F
Child
G
Child
Procedural Posture
Family Law Children Proceedings / Application for Transfer of Proceedings Under Article 15
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether proceedings concerning the children should be transferred to another Member State under Article 15 of Brussels II Revised
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the criteria for transfer under Article 15 were not met as the English court was best placed to determine the issues and transfer would not be in the best interests of the children.
Court Disposition
application for transfer refused
Orders
- proceedings to continue in the England and Wales Family Court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment