National Westminster Bank Plc v Feeney

National Westminster Bank Plc v Feeney

The counterclaim was automatically stayed because, after final judgment on the possession claim, the counterclaim became a separate proceeding and was not brought before a judge in the relevant period. Applications to suspend the warrant related only to enforcement and not to the counterclaim. The term 'existing proceedings' in Practice Direction 51 must be read to mean only those proceedings still capable of being litigated, not enforcement actions.

Parties
Appellant/claimant: National Westminster Bank PLC; Respondent/defendant: Thomas James Feeney; Respondent/defendant: Linda Catherinne Feeney
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 June 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Second Appeal From County Court Order
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Transitional Provisions, Automatic Stay, Counterclaims, Final Judgment, Civil Procedure Rules Part 51
Civil Procedure Transitional Provisions Automatic Stay Counterclaims Final Judgment Civil Procedure Rules Part 51

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

National Westminster Bank PLC

Appellant/claimant

Thomas James Feeney

Respondent/defendant

Linda Catherinne Feeney

Respondent/defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Second Appeal From County Court Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the counterclaim was automatically stayed under CPR Part 51 transitional provisions
  2. 2 Whether hearings on enforcement of possession order kept the counterclaim alive
  3. 3 Interpretation of 'existing proceedings' and 'final judgment' under Practice Direction 51

Ratio Decidendi

The counterclaim was automatically stayed because, after final judgment on the possession claim, the counterclaim became a separate proceeding and was not brought before a judge in the relevant period. Applications to suspend the warrant related only to enforcement and not to the counterclaim. The term 'existing proceedings' in Practice Direction 51 must be read to mean only those proceedings still capable of being litigated, not enforcement actions.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • District judge's order restored
  • Costs subject to detailed assessment, not to be enforced without application to court