Repic Ltd, R (on the application of) v The Scottish Environment Protection Agency & Anor [2009] EWHC 2015 (Admin) (31 July 2009)
Paragraph 4 of Part 4 of Schedule 7 requires producer compliance schemes to have viable plans to collect an amount of WEEE equivalent to their financial responsibility under Regulation 22, prohibiting both intentional over-collection and under-collection. However, actual over- or under-collection resulting from genuine estimation difficulties does not breach the requirement if viable plans were in place and followed. The Regulations lawfully transpose the WEEE Directive, and trading in evidence notes is not inconsistent with the Directive. The Defendants' decision not to take enforcement action against over-collecting schemes was not irrational or unlawful given the context and their...
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 2015 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: REPIC Limited; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform; Second Defendant: The Environment Agency; First Interested Party: The Scottish Environment Protection Agency; Second Interested Party: Electrolink Recycling Limited; Third Interested Party: WERC Limited t/a City Compliance Scheme
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Transposition of EU Directives, Producer Responsibility, Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (weee), Statutory Interpretation, Enforcement Discretion, Judicial Review of Regulatory Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
REPIC Limited
Claimant
Secretary of State for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
First Defendant
The Environment Agency
Second Defendant
The Scottish Environment Protection Agency
First Interested Party
Electrolink Recycling Limited
Second Interested Party
WERC Limited t/a City Compliance Scheme
Third Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper interpretation of paragraph 4 of Part 4 of Schedule 7 of the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Regulations 2006
- 2 Whether the Regulations lawfully transpose Directive 2002/96/EC (WEEE Directive) into UK law
- 3 Whether intentional over-collection of WEEE by producer compliance schemes breaches the Regulations
Ratio Decidendi
Paragraph 4 of Part 4 of Schedule 7 requires producer compliance schemes to have viable plans to collect an amount of WEEE equivalent to their financial responsibility under Regulation 22, prohibiting both intentional over-collection and under-collection. However, actual over- or under-collection resulting from genuine estimation difficulties does not breach the requirement if viable plans were in place and followed. The Regulations lawfully transpose the WEEE Directive, and trading in evidence notes is not inconsistent with the Directive. The Defendants' decision not to take enforcement action against over-collecting schemes was not irrational or unlawful given the context and their...
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment