Perrin & Anor v Northampton Borough Council & Ors [2006] EWHC 2331 (TCC) (26 September 2006)
For the purposes of s.198(6)(b) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, the necessity of cutting down, uprooting, topping or lopping a tree is determined solely by whether such works are required to abate or prevent an actionable nuisance; the existence of alternative engineering solutions or the amenity value of the tree are irrelevant to this statutory exemption.
- Citation
- [2006] EWHC 2331 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: Alison R Perrin; Claimant: William S Ramage; First Defendant: Northampton Borough Council; Second Defendant: Frederick Harry Shephard; Third Defendant: Sandra Shephard
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 September 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Preliminary Issue Judgment
- Outcome
- Declaration granted in favour of the claimants on the preliminary issue.
- Legal Topics
- Tree Preservation Orders, Nuisance, Statutory Interpretation, Remedies for Property Damage
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alison R Perrin
Claimant
William S Ramage
Claimant
Northampton Borough Council
First Defendant
Frederick Harry Shephard
Second Defendant
Sandra Shephard
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Preliminary Issue Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether, under s.198(6)(b) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, the existence of alternative works (such as underpinning) is relevant to determining if cutting down or lopping a protected tree is 'necessary' for the prevention or abatement of a nuisance.
- 2 Whether 'nuisance' in s.198(6)(b) means actionable nuisance or includes mere encroachment.
Ratio Decidendi
For the purposes of s.198(6)(b) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, the necessity of cutting down, uprooting, topping or lopping a tree is determined solely by whether such works are required to abate or prevent an actionable nuisance; the existence of alternative engineering solutions or the amenity value of the tree are irrelevant to this statutory exemption.
Court Disposition
Declaration granted in favour of the claimants on the preliminary issue.
Orders
- It is irrelevant, for the purposes of s.198(6)(b) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, that there are other possible works that could prevent or abate the same nuisance.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment