Evans v First Secretary of State & Anor
The inspector did not err in law or exceed her powers in considering the effect of the development on protected trees, nor was she required to address proposed conditions not advanced as overcoming the objections. The reasons given were adequate and justified the refusal of planning permission.
- Parties
- Claimant: Evans; First Defendant: First Secretary of State; Second Defendant: Waverley Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 September 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990) / Judgment on Application to Quash Planning Inspector's Decision
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Tree Preservation Orders, Planning Permission, Judicial Review, Adequacy of Reasons
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Evans
Claimant
First Secretary of State
First Defendant
Waverley Borough Council
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990) / Judgment on Application to Quash Planning Inspector's Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the inspector exceeded her powers in considering the effect of the development on protected trees
- 2 Whether the inspector gave adequate reasons for her decision, particularly regarding proposed planning conditions
Ratio Decidendi
The inspector did not err in law or exceed her powers in considering the effect of the development on protected trees, nor was she required to address proposed conditions not advanced as overcoming the objections. The reasons given were adequate and justified the refusal of planning permission.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application to quash inspector's decision dismissed
- Claimant to pay First Defendant's costs assessed at £4,345
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment