Fisher & Anoe v The Cumbria Constabulary [1997] EWCA Civ 2232 (29 July 1997)
The judge was correct to find that DC Little had reasonable and probable cause to obtain the search warrant based on reliable information from a magistrate, despite superficial observations. The failure to leave a copy of the warrant was a procedural irregularity due to mere forgetfulness, rendering the entry a technical trespass but not justifying excessive damages. The jury's damages award was excessive and should be reduced to fair compensation for the trespass and aggravating circumstances.
- Citation
- [1997] EWCA Civ 2232
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Raymond Asley Fisher; Plaintiff/respondent: Nigel John Fisher; Defendant/appellant: The Chief Constable of the Cumbria Constabulary
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Carlisle County Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; damages reduced; cross-appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Trespass, Malicious Process, Search Warrants, Damages, Police Powers, Procedural Irregularity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Raymond Asley Fisher
Plaintiff/respondent
Nigel John Fisher
Plaintiff/respondent
The Chief Constable of the Cumbria Constabulary
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Carlisle County Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether DC Little had reasonable and probable cause to procure a search warrant for the plaintiffs' premises
- 2 Whether failure to leave a copy of the search warrant rendered the search unlawful
- 3 Appropriate measure of damages for unlawful search and failure to provide warrant copy
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was correct to find that DC Little had reasonable and probable cause to obtain the search warrant based on reliable information from a magistrate, despite superficial observations. The failure to leave a copy of the warrant was a procedural irregularity due to mere forgetfulness, rendering the entry a technical trespass but not justifying excessive damages. The jury's damages award was excessive and should be reduced to fair compensation for the trespass and aggravating circumstances.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; damages reduced; cross-appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Damages award reduced to £1,250 in total (£750 for trespass, £500 for aggravating feature).
- Counsel to supply Minute of Order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment