TN (Vietnam) & Anor, R. (On the Application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor
The First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) does not have jurisdiction to set aside earlier appeal decisions made under the 2005 Fast Track Rules, as there was no equivalent power in those rules and the 2014 Rules do not have retrospective effect. The relevant 2014 Rules are intra vires the enabling statute and properly restrict the FTT's powers.
- Parties
- Claimant: TN (Vietnam); Claimant: US (Pakistan); 1st Defendant: First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber); 2nd Defendant: Lord Chancellor; Interested Party: Secretary of State for the Home Department; Interested Parties: 31 Other Appellants
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment After Full Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim for judicial review dismissed; earlier appeal decision in the case of US quashed by the High Court.
- Legal Topics
- Tribunal Jurisdiction, Ultra Vires, Retrospective Application of Rules, Finality of Litigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TN (Vietnam)
Claimant
US (Pakistan)
Claimant
First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
1st Defendant
Lord Chancellor
2nd Defendant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Interested Party
31 Other Appellants
Interested Parties
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment After Full Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) has jurisdiction to set aside earlier appeal decisions made under the 2005 Fast Track Rules, declared ultra vires
- 2 Whether the 2014 Tribunal Procedure Rules confer retrospective jurisdiction to set aside such decisions
- 3 Whether the relevant 2014 Rules are ultra vires the enabling statute
Ratio Decidendi
The First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) does not have jurisdiction to set aside earlier appeal decisions made under the 2005 Fast Track Rules, as there was no equivalent power in those rules and the 2014 Rules do not have retrospective effect. The relevant 2014 Rules are intra vires the enabling statute and properly restrict the FTT's powers.
Court Disposition
Claim for judicial review dismissed; earlier appeal decision in the case of US quashed by the High Court.
Orders
- Claim for judicial review of the FTT is dismissed.
- Appeal against the decision of Ouseley J is dismissed save that the earlier appeal decision by the FTT in the case of US is quashed by the High Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment