Clare Alison Laird (as executor and trustee of the estate of Robert John Simcock) v Catherine Anne Lowder Simcock (as executor, trustee and beneficiary of the estate of Robert John Simcock) & Ors.
The claimant’s carelessness in executing the Deed without knowledge of the Will, estate, or intended effect, and her subsequent conduct, justified depriving her of indemnity from the estate and ordering her to pay the defendants’ costs. The need for the claim arose from her and her solicitor’s failures, not from an unavoidable issue requiring court determination.
- Parties
- Claimant: Clare Alison Laird; First Defendant: Catherine Anne Lowder Simcock; Second Defendant: Charlotte Rebecca Simcock; Third Defendant: Elizabeth June Simcock; Fourth Defendant: Gemma Louise Simcock
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Probate/trusts / Costs Determination Following Dismissal of Rectification Claim
- Outcome
- Claimant deprived of indemnity; claimant ordered to pay defendants’ costs; scope of recoverable costs limited to those of and incidental to the claim.
- Legal Topics
- Trustee Indemnity for Costs, Rectification of Deeds, Costs Orders in Estate Litigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Clare Alison Laird
Claimant
Catherine Anne Lowder Simcock
First Defendant
Charlotte Rebecca Simcock
Second Defendant
Elizabeth June Simcock
Third Defendant
Gemma Louise Simcock
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate/trusts / Costs Determination Following Dismissal of Rectification Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant trustee is entitled to indemnity from the estate for her costs
- 2 Whether the claimant should pay the defendants’ costs
- 3 Scope of costs recoverable in trust/estate litigation
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant’s carelessness in executing the Deed without knowledge of the Will, estate, or intended effect, and her subsequent conduct, justified depriving her of indemnity from the estate and ordering her to pay the defendants’ costs. The need for the claim arose from her and her solicitor’s failures, not from an unavoidable issue requiring court determination.
Court Disposition
Claimant deprived of indemnity; claimant ordered to pay defendants’ costs; scope of recoverable costs limited to those of and incidental to the claim.
Orders
- Claimant to pay defendants’ costs of the claim; claimant not entitled to indemnity from the estate for her own costs or any costs paid to the defendants; recoverable costs do not include costs of preparation and execution of the Deed or costs relating to breakdown of family relationships.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment