Forbes Trustee Services Ltd & Anor v Jackson & Ors [2004] EWHC 2448 (Ch) (02 November 2004)

Forbes Trustee Services Ltd & Anor v Jackson & Ors [2004] EWHC 2448 (Ch) (02 November 2004)

Trustees are entitled to vote against the plan as they have properly considered relevant actuarial, legal, and practical factors, including comparative recoveries, risks of underfunding, and fairness between scheme members. Their discretion is properly exercised and court confirms such action is permissible.

Citation
[2004] EWHC 2448 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Alexander Forbes Trustee Services Limited; Claimant: T&N Pensions Trustee Limited; First Defendant: Joanne Jackson; Second Defendant: Owen Oliver; Third Defendant: T&N Limited (in administration)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
02 November 2004
Procedural Posture
Trustee Application for Court Directions / Judgment on Application for Directions Regarding Voting on Restructuring Plan
Outcome
Application granted; trustees permitted to vote against the plan.
Legal Topics
Trustee Powers, Scheme of Arrangement, Chapter 11 Bankruptcy, Statutory Funding Requirements, Compromise of Claims, Priority of Creditors
Pensions Insolvency Trusts Company Law Trustee Powers Scheme of Arrangement Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Statutory Funding Requirements +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 17
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alexander Forbes Trustee Services Limited

Claimant

T&N Pensions Trustee Limited

Claimant

Joanne Jackson

First Defendant

Owen Oliver

Second Defendant

T&N Limited (in administration)

Third Defendant

Procedural Posture

Trustee Application for Court Directions / Judgment on Application for Directions Regarding Voting on Restructuring Plan

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Should trustees be permitted to vote against the restructuring plan for T&N and related companies?
  2. 2 Are trustees acting properly in exercising discretion to reject the plan?
  3. 3 Does the plan adequately protect scheme members' interests compared to controlled realisation?

Ratio Decidendi

Trustees are entitled to vote against the plan as they have properly considered relevant actuarial, legal, and practical factors, including comparative recoveries, risks of underfunding, and fairness between scheme members. Their discretion is properly exercised and court confirms such action is permissible.

Court Disposition

Application granted; trustees permitted to vote against the plan.

Orders

  • Trustees are authorised to vote against the restructuring plan for T&N and related companies.
  • Trustees' exercise of discretion in this regard is confirmed as proper.