Baxendale-Walker v Irwin Mitchell LLP & Ors (Rev 1) [2018] EWHC 3572 (Ch) (20 December 2018)
The trustees' requests for documents from solicitors were not perverse under section 303; trustees acted within statutory powers under sections 311 and 366; requests for documents, including privileged and personal papers relating to bankrupt's estate or affairs, were lawful; applicant failed to meet high threshold for court intervention.
- Citation
- [2018] EWHC 3572 (Ch)
- Parties
- Applicant (bankrupt): Paul Baxendale-Walker; First Respondent: Irwin Mitchell LLP; Second Respondent: Johnsons Solicitors Limited; Third Respondent: Griffin Law Limited; Fourth Respondent: Mischon de Reya LLP; Fifth Respondents (trustees in Bankruptcy): Michael Leeds and Kevin Hellard; Sixth Respondent: Hawk Consultancy LLC; Creditor: HMRC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Application Under Insolvency Act 1986 / Judgment on Section 303 Application
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Trustee Powers, Solicitor Client Privilege, Document Disclosure, Personal Papers, Section 303 Challenge
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Baxendale-Walker
Applicant (bankrupt)
Irwin Mitchell LLP
First Respondent
Johnsons Solicitors Limited
Second Respondent
Griffin Law Limited
Third Respondent
Mischon de Reya LLP
Fourth Respondent
Michael Leeds and Kevin Hellard
Fifth Respondents (trustees in Bankruptcy)
Hawk Consultancy LLC
Sixth Respondent
HMRC
Creditor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application Under Insolvency Act 1986 / Judgment on Section 303 Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether trustees' requests for documents from solicitors were perverse under section 303 Insolvency Act 1986
- 2 Whether trustees are entitled to privileged documents and personal papers under sections 311 and 366
- 3 Scope of trustee's entitlement to documents belonging to or under control of bankrupt
Ratio Decidendi
The trustees' requests for documents from solicitors were not perverse under section 303; trustees acted within statutory powers under sections 311 and 366; requests for documents, including privileged and personal papers relating to bankrupt's estate or affairs, were lawful; applicant failed to meet high threshold for court intervention.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment