SwissIndependent Trustees SA v Sofer & Ors [2024] EWHC 1543 (Ch) (20 June 2024)

SwissIndependent Trustees SA v Sofer & Ors [2024] EWHC 1543 (Ch) (20 June 2024)

The trustee's proposal to wind up the trusts and distribute assets to specified beneficiaries was a lawful exercise of its powers, made after proper consideration, and not vitiated by conflict of interest; the court should approve the proposal as a momentous decision within the second category of Public Trustee v Cooper.

Citation
[2024] EWHC 1543 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Swissindependent Trustees SA; First Defendant: Robert Sofer; Second Defendant: Tamara Wolpert; Third Defendant: Jay Wolpert; Fourth Defendant: Lindsay Perlman; Fifth Defendant: Marissa Serda; Sixth Defendant: Matthew Shayle
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 June 2024
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim (trusts) / Judgment on Application for Court Approval of Trustee's Proposal
Outcome
Application granted; court approval given to trustee's proposal.
Legal Topics
Trustee Powers, Winding Up Trusts, Court Approval of Trustee Decisions, Discretionary Trusts, Beneficiary Rights
Trusts and Estates Equity Trustee Powers Winding Up Trusts Court Approval of Trustee Decisions Discretionary Trusts Beneficiary Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Swissindependent Trustees SA

Claimant

Robert Sofer

First Defendant

Tamara Wolpert

Second Defendant

Jay Wolpert

Third Defendant

Lindsay Perlman

Fourth Defendant

Marissa Serda

Fifth Defendant

Matthew Shayle

Sixth Defendant

Procedural Posture

Part 8 Claim (trusts) / Judgment on Application for Court Approval of Trustee's Proposal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trustee's proposal to wind up the trusts and distribute assets to specified beneficiaries is a lawful exercise of trustee powers
  2. 2 Whether the court should approve a momentous decision by the trustee that eliminates the interests of minor and unborn beneficiaries

Ratio Decidendi

The trustee's proposal to wind up the trusts and distribute assets to specified beneficiaries was a lawful exercise of its powers, made after proper consideration, and not vitiated by conflict of interest; the court should approve the proposal as a momentous decision within the second category of Public Trustee v Cooper.

Court Disposition

Application granted; court approval given to trustee's proposal.

Orders

  • Court approves the proposal to wind up the trusts and distribute remaining assets to specified beneficiaries.
  • Trustee authorised to exercise powers of appointment and vesting as proposed.