Merchant Navy Ratings Pension Fund Trustees Ltd v Stena Line Ltd & Ors
The trustee's proposed exercise of the amendment power to introduce the New Regime, making all participating employers liable for deficit contributions and giving credit for past contributions, is within the scope of the power and a proper exercise of discretion. The trustee acted for proper purposes, considered all relevant factors, relied on appropriate professional advice, and did not act irrationally or for an improper purpose. The New Regime is not retrospective or a re-writing of history. The scheme is 'frozen' for section 75 purposes, and C2 Employers cannot withdraw without meeting the withdrawal conditions. The court approves the New Regime and the supporting amendments.
- Parties
- Claimant: Merchant Navy Ratings Pension Fund Trustees Limited; First Defendant: Stena Line Limited; Second Defendant: P&O Ferries Limited; Third Defendant: Sealion Shipping Limited; Fourth Defendant: International Marine Transportation Limited; Fifth Defendant: Terence Brown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Part 8 Claim (trustee Application for Court Approval) / Judgment After Full Hearing
- Outcome
- Court approves the trustee's proposed amendments and the New Regime; all issues determined in favour of the trustee.
- Legal Topics
- Trustee Powers, Pension Scheme Amendments, Employer Contributions, Section 75 Pensions Act 1995, Scheme Deficit Repair, Fiduciary Duties, Proper Purpose Doctrine, Retrospective Amendments, Withdrawal of Employers, Scheme Funding
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Merchant Navy Ratings Pension Fund Trustees Limited
Claimant
Stena Line Limited
First Defendant
P&O Ferries Limited
Second Defendant
Sealion Shipping Limited
Third Defendant
International Marine Transportation Limited
Fourth Defendant
Terence Brown
Fifth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim (trustee Application for Court Approval) / Judgment After Full Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trustee has power to amend the pension scheme rules to introduce a new deficit contribution regime (the 'New Regime') making all participating employers liable for deficit contributions, including historic employers;
- 2 Whether the exercise of the amendment power for this purpose is a proper exercise of discretion and within the scope of the power;
- 3 Whether the New Regime can give credit for past contributions (re-apportionment) and whether this is retrospective or a re-writing of history;
Ratio Decidendi
The trustee's proposed exercise of the amendment power to introduce the New Regime, making all participating employers liable for deficit contributions and giving credit for past contributions, is within the scope of the power and a proper exercise of discretion. The trustee acted for proper purposes, considered all relevant factors, relied on appropriate professional advice, and did not act irrationally or for an improper purpose. The New Regime is not retrospective or a re-writing of history. The scheme is 'frozen' for section 75 purposes, and C2 Employers cannot withdraw without meeting the withdrawal conditions. The court approves the New Regime and the supporting amendments.
Court Disposition
Court approves the trustee's proposed amendments and the New Regime; all issues determined in favour of the trustee.
Orders
- The trustee is authorised to amend the scheme rules as set out in the schedule to the judgment to implement the New Regime.
- The New Regime, including augmentation, re-apportionment, orphan loading, joint and several liability, synthetic section 75 debts, and ancillary features, is approved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment