Schumacher & Anor v Clarke & Ors

Schumacher & Anor v Clarke & Ors

The court declined to approve the trustees' proposed dispositions because the decision-making process was vitiated by unresolved and unmanaged conflicts of interest between the trustees, mutual accusations of non-fiduciary conduct, and a lack of genuine engagement. The process did not meet the standards required for court approval under Public Trustee v Cooper Category 2.

Parties
Claimant: Patrik Schumacher; 1st Defendant: Brian Clarke; 2nd Defendant: Rana Hadid; 3rd Defendant: The Right Honourable Peter Garth Baron Palumbo; 4th Defendant: Marie Noelle M Janssens; 5th Defendant: Alberto Barba Guerrero; 6th Defendant: Christian Gibbon; 7th Defendant: The Zaha Hadid Foundation
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
25 November 2020
Procedural Posture
Probate/trust Dispute / Judgment on Application for Court Approval (public Trustee V Cooper Category 2)
Outcome
Applications for court approval dismissed
Legal Topics
Trustee Powers, Conflict of Interest, Court Approval of Trustee Decisions, Settlement of Estate Disputes
Trusts and Estates Probate Law Trustee Powers Conflict of Interest Court Approval of Trustee Decisions Settlement of Estate Disputes

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Patrik Schumacher

Claimant

Brian Clarke

1st Defendant

Rana Hadid

2nd Defendant

The Right Honourable Peter Garth Baron Palumbo

3rd Defendant

Marie Noelle M Janssens

4th Defendant

Alberto Barba Guerrero

5th Defendant

Christian Gibbon

6th Defendant

The Zaha Hadid Foundation

7th Defendant

Procedural Posture

Probate/trust Dispute / Judgment on Application for Court Approval (public Trustee V Cooper Category 2)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the court should approve the trustees' proposed dispositions under the will trust pursuant to Public Trustee v Cooper Category 2
  2. 2 Whether the trustees' decision-making process was vitiated by conflicts of interest

Ratio Decidendi

The court declined to approve the trustees' proposed dispositions because the decision-making process was vitiated by unresolved and unmanaged conflicts of interest between the trustees, mutual accusations of non-fiduciary conduct, and a lack of genuine engagement. The process did not meet the standards required for court approval under Public Trustee v Cooper Category 2.

Court Disposition

Applications for court approval dismissed

Orders

  • Both applications for approval under Public Trustee v Cooper Category 2 are dismissed.