Bagum v Hafiz & Anor [2015] EWCA Civ 801 (22 July 2015)
The court does not have jurisdiction under section 14 of TOLATA to order a beneficiary to sell or transfer their beneficial interest to another beneficiary. However, the court does have jurisdiction to direct trustees to sell the trust property, including to a particular beneficiary with a right of pre-emption, provided the order is within the court's wide discretion under TOLATA and considers the statutory factors. The judge's order was a proper exercise of that discretion.
- Citation
- [2015] EWCA Civ 801
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Bagum; 1st Defendant/respondent: Hafiz; 2nd Defendant/appellant: Hai
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal and Cross Appeal From Central London County Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (tolata), Co Ownership of Land, Court's Discretionary Powers Under TOLATA, Order for Sale of Trust Property, Beneficiaries' Rights and Interests
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bagum
Claimant/respondent
Hafiz
1st Defendant/respondent
Hai
2nd Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal and Cross Appeal From Central London County Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the court have jurisdiction under section 14 of TOLATA to order a beneficiary to sell or transfer their beneficial interest to another beneficiary?
- 2 Can the court direct trustees to sell trust property to a particular beneficiary without the consent of all beneficiaries?
- 3 Was the judge's exercise of discretion in making the order proper under TOLATA?
Ratio Decidendi
The court does not have jurisdiction under section 14 of TOLATA to order a beneficiary to sell or transfer their beneficial interest to another beneficiary. However, the court does have jurisdiction to direct trustees to sell the trust property, including to a particular beneficiary with a right of pre-emption, provided the order is within the court's wide discretion under TOLATA and considers the statutory factors. The judge's order was a proper exercise of that discretion.
Court Disposition
Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed
Orders
- The order of HHJ May QC stands: the property is to be sold, with Mr. Hafiz having the opportunity to purchase at a court-determined price within six weeks, failing which the property is to be sold on the open market with liberty for all parties to bid.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment