Bagum v Hafiz & Anor
The court does not have power under section 14 of TOLATA to order a beneficiary to sell or transfer their beneficial interest to another beneficiary, but does have power to direct trustees to sell the trust property to a particular beneficiary, including granting a right of pre-emption, as part of its wide discretion under TOLATA. The judge's order for sale with a right of pre-emption to Mr. Hafiz was within her jurisdiction and a proper exercise of discretion, having regard to the interests and wishes of the beneficiaries and the purposes of the trust.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Bagum; 1st Defendant/respondent: Hafiz; 2nd Defendant/appellant: Hai
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal and Cross Appeal From Central London County Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (tolata), Co Ownership, Court's Discretionary Powers, Order for Sale of Trust Property
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bagum
Claimant/respondent
Hafiz
1st Defendant/respondent
Hai
2nd Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal and Cross Appeal From Central London County Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has power under section 14 of TOLATA to order a beneficiary to sell or transfer their beneficial interest to another beneficiary
- 2 Whether the court can direct trustees to sell trust property to particular beneficiaries without the consent of all beneficiaries
- 3 Whether the judge's exercise of discretion under TOLATA was proper
Ratio Decidendi
The court does not have power under section 14 of TOLATA to order a beneficiary to sell or transfer their beneficial interest to another beneficiary, but does have power to direct trustees to sell the trust property to a particular beneficiary, including granting a right of pre-emption, as part of its wide discretion under TOLATA. The judge's order for sale with a right of pre-emption to Mr. Hafiz was within her jurisdiction and a proper exercise of discretion, having regard to the interests and wishes of the beneficiaries and the purposes of the trust.
Court Disposition
Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed
Orders
- Order of HHJ May QC affirmed: Property to be sold; Mr. Hafiz to have opportunity to purchase at court-determined price within 6 weeks, failing which open market sale with liberty for all beneficiaries to bid.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment