Laker Airway Ltd v Department of Trade [1976] EWCA Civ 10 (15 December 1976)
The Secretary of State's 1976 policy guidance was ultra vires because it contradicted the statutory objectives of the Civil Aviation Act 1971, particularly the requirement to encourage competition and prevent monopoly. The Secretary of State could not use guidance to achieve by indirect means what the statute did not permit directly. Furthermore, the prerogative power to withdraw designation could not be used to circumvent statutory protections or deprive Laker Airways of its rights without due process. The appeal was dismissed and the High Court's declaration that the Secretary of State acted unlawfully was upheld.
- Citation
- [1976] EWCA Civ 10
- Parties
- Plaintiff (respondent): Laker Airway Limited; Defendant (appellant): Department of Trade
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 1976
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division, Commercial List) / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Ultra Vires, Ministerial Discretion, Prerogative Powers, Estoppel Against the Crown, Statutory Interpretation, Licensing of Air Carriers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Laker Airway Limited
Plaintiff (respondent)
Department of Trade
Defendant (appellant)
Procedural Posture
Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division, Commercial List) / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Secretary of State's policy guidance to the Civil Aviation Authority was ultra vires the Civil Aviation Act 1971
- 2 Whether the Secretary of State could lawfully withdraw the designation of Laker Airways under the Bermuda Agreement by prerogative power
- 3 Whether estoppel could prevent the Crown from withdrawing designation or revoking the licence
Ratio Decidendi
The Secretary of State's 1976 policy guidance was ultra vires because it contradicted the statutory objectives of the Civil Aviation Act 1971, particularly the requirement to encourage competition and prevent monopoly. The Secretary of State could not use guidance to achieve by indirect means what the statute did not permit directly. Furthermore, the prerogative power to withdraw designation could not be used to circumvent statutory protections or deprive Laker Airways of its rights without due process. The appeal was dismissed and the High Court's declaration that the Secretary of State acted unlawfully was upheld.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Declaration that the Secretary of State's policy guidance was ultra vires and unlawful
- Secretary of State not entitled to withdraw Laker Airways' designation or require revocation of the Skytrain licence under the impugned guidance
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment