Richards & Anor, R (on the application of) v Pembrokeshire County Council [2004] EWCA Civ 813 (08 June 2004)
It would be unfair to the council to refuse admission of further evidence addressing new issues raised by the applicants' amended case; both parties should have the opportunity to respond to the new evidence.
- Citation
- [2004] EWCA Civ 813
- Parties
- Claimants/applicants: Paul D H Richards and Gillian A R Richards; Defendant/respondent: Pembrokeshire County Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 June 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Appeal / Application to Adduce Further Evidence on Appeal
- Outcome
- Application to adduce further evidence allowed
- Legal Topics
- Ultra Vires, Admissibility of Evidence, Judicial Review, Harbour Regulations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul D H Richards and Gillian A R Richards
Claimants/applicants
Pembrokeshire County Council
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Application to Adduce Further Evidence on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether further evidence should be admitted on appeal following amendment of the applicant's case
- 2 Whether the parking regulations were ultra vires the council's powers under the Harbours Act 1964
Ratio Decidendi
It would be unfair to the council to refuse admission of further evidence addressing new issues raised by the applicants' amended case; both parties should have the opportunity to respond to the new evidence.
Court Disposition
Application to adduce further evidence allowed
Orders
- Both parties permitted to file further evidence as specified
- Applicants to file evidence in response by 3 pm on Friday 11 June 2004
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment