The Queen (on the application of D4) (notice of deprivation of citizenship) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
Regulation 10(4) of the British Nationality (General) Regulations 2003 is ultra vires the British Nationality Act 1981 because it allows the Secretary of State to deem notice as given by placing it on file without taking any steps to communicate with the affected person, contrary to the mandatory requirement in section 40(5) to give written notice. The enabling power in section 41(1)(e) does not extend to dispensing with notice altogether, and only Parliament can alter this statutory safeguard.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: THE QUEEN (on the application of D4); Defendant/appellant: SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (administrative Law) / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Ultra Vires, Deprivation of Citizenship, Statutory Interpretation, Notice Requirements, Delegated Legislation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
THE QUEEN (on the application of D4)
Claimant/respondent
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (administrative Law) / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Regulation 10(4) of the British Nationality (General) Regulations 2003 is ultra vires the enabling provisions of the British Nationality Act 1981
- 2 Whether the Secretary of State can deem notice to have been given by placing it on file when no steps have been taken to communicate the notice to the affected person
Ratio Decidendi
Regulation 10(4) of the British Nationality (General) Regulations 2003 is ultra vires the British Nationality Act 1981 because it allows the Secretary of State to deem notice as given by placing it on file without taking any steps to communicate with the affected person, contrary to the mandatory requirement in section 40(5) to give written notice. The enabling power in section 41(1)(e) does not extend to dispensing with notice altogether, and only Parliament can alter this statutory safeguard.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Declaration that Regulation 10(4) is ultra vires and void
- Declaration that the deprivation order against D4 is a nullity
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment