Haw, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor
Section 132(1) of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005, as enacted, does not apply to demonstrations that began before the Act came into force. The Commencement Order purporting to extend section 132(1) to continuing demonstrations was ultra vires, as section 178 did not confer power to amend the Act. Penal statutes must be strictly construed, and any extension of criminal liability must be clearly authorised by Parliament.
- Parties
- Claimant: Brian Haw; First Defendant: Secretary of State for the Home Department; Second Defendant: Commissioner for the Metropolitan Police Service
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Substantive Judgment After Grant of Leave
- Outcome
- Application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Ultra Vires, Commencement Orders, Penal Statutes, Transitional Provisions, Freedom of Expression
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brian Haw
Claimant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
First Defendant
Commissioner for the Metropolitan Police Service
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Substantive Judgment After Grant of Leave
Legal Issues
- 1 Does section 132(1) of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 apply to demonstrations that began before the Act came into force?
- 2 Was the Commencement Order purporting to extend section 132(1) to continuing demonstrations ultra vires?
- 3 Should penal statutes be strictly construed against the state?
Ratio Decidendi
Section 132(1) of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005, as enacted, does not apply to demonstrations that began before the Act came into force. The Commencement Order purporting to extend section 132(1) to continuing demonstrations was ultra vires, as section 178 did not confer power to amend the Act. Penal statutes must be strictly construed, and any extension of criminal liability must be clearly authorised by Parliament.
Court Disposition
Application allowed
Orders
- Order quashing Articles 3(1)(p), 3(5), and 4(2) of the Commencement Order as ultra vires
- Declaration that the claimant is not required to seek authorisation for the continuing protest under sections 132 to 138
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment