Circle 33 Housing Trust Ltd v Kathirkmanathan [2009] EWCA Civ 921 (16 July 2009)
The judge misdirected himself by construing the undertaking to cover 'allowing' or 'permitting' conduct, which was not in its terms; there was no finding or evidence appellant personally breached the undertaking; appeal allowed and committal order discharged.
- Citation
- [2009] EWCA Civ 921
- Parties
- Respondent/appellant: Circle 33 Housing Trust Ltd; Appellant/respondent: Kathirkmanathan
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; committal order discharged.
- Legal Topics
- Undertakings, Committal for Breach, Noise Nuisance, Interpretation of Injunctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Circle 33 Housing Trust Ltd
Respondent/appellant
Kathirkmanathan
Appellant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper construction of undertaking
- 2 Whether appellant personally breached undertaking
- 3 Appropriateness of sentence for contempt
Ratio Decidendi
The judge misdirected himself by construing the undertaking to cover 'allowing' or 'permitting' conduct, which was not in its terms; there was no finding or evidence appellant personally breached the undertaking; appeal allowed and committal order discharged.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; committal order discharged.
Orders
- Committal order discharged
- Appellant released from prison
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment