Adams & Ors v Atlas International Property Services Ltd & Ors [2016] EWHC 2680 (QB) (28 October 2016)

Adams & Ors v Atlas International Property Services Ltd & Ors [2016] EWHC 2680 (QB) (28 October 2016)

Claimants must make their election between agent and undisclosed principal before judgment is handed down; there is no opportunity to elect after judgment or after the draft judgment is circulated.

Citation
[2016] EWHC 2680
Parties
Claimants: Roger Keith Adams and Others; Defendants: Atlas International Property Services Limited and Others; Defendants: Miguel Ángel Aroca Seiquer and Aroca Seiquer & Asociados SL
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 October 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Trial, Pre Final Judgment
Outcome
Interlocutory determination on timing of election; no final disposition of substantive claims.
Legal Topics
Undisclosed Principal, Election of Remedies, Judgment Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Roger Keith Adams and Others

Claimants

Atlas International Property Services Limited and Others

Defendants

Miguel Ángel Aroca Seiquer and Aroca Seiquer & Asociados SL

Defendants

Procedural Posture

Civil / Post Trial, Pre Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether claimants must elect between judgment against agent or undisclosed principal before judgment is handed down
  2. 2 Timing of election in cases involving undisclosed principals

Ratio Decidendi

Claimants must make their election between agent and undisclosed principal before judgment is handed down; there is no opportunity to elect after judgment or after the draft judgment is circulated.

Court Disposition

Interlocutory determination on timing of election; no final disposition of substantive claims.

Orders

  • Claimants to notify the court of their election before 4 November 2016; otherwise, court will proceed on basis that primary claim is against Sr. Aroca.