Ivy Technology Ltd v Martin & Ors [2020] EWHC 94 (Comm) (23 January 2020)
Permission to amend Particulars of Claim to allege Second Defendant as principal is granted as claim has real prospect of success; court declines to resolve exclusion of liability, estoppel, and election at this stage; permission to amend to treat warranties as representations is refused.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 94 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: Ivy Technology Limited; First Defendant: Barry Martin; Second Defendant: Paul Bell; Third Defendant: AXL Media Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 January 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Application / Application to Amend Particulars of Claim
- Outcome
- Permission to amend Particulars of Claim granted in part; permission refused regarding warranties as representations.
- Legal Topics
- Undisclosed Principal Liability, Amendment of Pleadings, Estoppel, Election, Warranties Vs Representations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ivy Technology Limited
Claimant
Barry Martin
First Defendant
Paul Bell
Second Defendant
AXL Media Limited
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Application / Application to Amend Particulars of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Second Defendant can be sued as disclosed or undisclosed principal under share sale agreement
- 2 Whether terms of agreement exclude Second Defendant's liability
- 3 Whether warranties can be treated as representations
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to amend Particulars of Claim to allege Second Defendant as principal is granted as claim has real prospect of success; court declines to resolve exclusion of liability, estoppel, and election at this stage; permission to amend to treat warranties as representations is refused.
Court Disposition
Permission to amend Particulars of Claim granted in part; permission refused regarding warranties as representations.
Orders
- Parties to agree order reflecting judgment decisions.
- Permission to amend to allege Second Defendant as principal granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment