Yorkshire Bank Plc v Tinsley
The 1994 mortgage was inseparably connected with the earlier voidable mortgages obtained by undue influence, and since the bank had constructive notice of the undue influence affecting the earlier mortgages, the substituted mortgage is also voidable and must be set aside.
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: Yorkshire Bank Plc; Appellant/defendant: Pamela Tinsley
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; claim dismissed; counterclaim allowed; mortgage set aside
- Legal Topics
- Undue Influence, Voidable Mortgages, Constructive Notice, Unconscionable Bargain, Remortgage Substitution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yorkshire Bank Plc
Respondent/claimant
Pamela Tinsley
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1994 mortgage was voidable due to its connection with earlier voidable mortgages obtained by undue influence
- 2 Whether the bank had constructive notice of undue influence affecting the earlier mortgages and thus the substituted mortgage
- 3 Whether the 1994 mortgage was an unconscionable bargain
Ratio Decidendi
The 1994 mortgage was inseparably connected with the earlier voidable mortgages obtained by undue influence, and since the bank had constructive notice of the undue influence affecting the earlier mortgages, the substituted mortgage is also voidable and must be set aside.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; claim dismissed; counterclaim allowed; mortgage set aside
Orders
- Order for possession granted to the bank discharged
- Respondent's claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment