Barclays Bank Plc v O'Brien [1992] EWCA Civ 11 (22 May 1992)

Barclays Bank Plc v O'Brien [1992] EWCA Civ 11 (22 May 1992)

Where a wife provides security for her husband's debts and the creditor leaves it to the husband to procure her consent, the creditor cannot enforce the security if the wife did not understand the transaction and received no independent advice, regardless of whether the husband acted as agent. The agency concept is not determinative; equity intervenes to protect the wife in such circumstances.

Citation
[1992] EWCA Civ 11
Parties
Respondent (plaintiff): Barclays Bank plc; First Defendant: Nicholas Edward O'Brien; Appellant (second Defendant): Bridget Mary O'Brien
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 May 1992
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Undue Influence, Misrepresentation, Third Party Security, Suretyship, Independent Legal Advice, Agency
Equity Contract Law Banking Law Undue Influence Misrepresentation Third Party Security Suretyship Independent Legal Advice +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Barclays Bank plc

Respondent (plaintiff)

Nicholas Edward O'Brien

First Defendant

Bridget Mary O'Brien

Appellant (second Defendant)

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a wife who signs a security document at her husband's request can be bound by it when her consent was procured by misrepresentation or undue influence and she received no independent advice
  2. 2 Whether the creditor is affected by the improprieties of the debtor in procuring the third party's consent
  3. 3 Whether the agency concept is determinative in such cases

Ratio Decidendi

Where a wife provides security for her husband's debts and the creditor leaves it to the husband to procure her consent, the creditor cannot enforce the security if the wife did not understand the transaction and received no independent advice, regardless of whether the husband acted as agent. The agency concept is not determinative; equity intervenes to protect the wife in such circumstances.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • The charge against Mrs. O'Brien is set aside
  • Bank cannot enforce security against Mrs. O'Brien