Jeffries, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 1504 (29 November 2024)
The sentencing judge correctly identified the appropriate categories for burglary and intimidation, considered aggravating and mitigating factors, and made reductions for totality within the permissible range. The sentence, though generous in some respects, was not unduly lenient and did not warrant interference on reference.
- Citation
- [2024] EWCA Crim 1504
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Offender/respondent: Jordan Jeffries
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal Reference by Attorney General Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988 / Application for Leave to Refer Sentence as Unduly Lenient
- Outcome
- Leave to refer sentence as unduly lenient refused.
- Legal Topics
- Unduly Lenient Sentence, Burglary, Intimidation, Sentencing Guidelines, Breach of Suspended Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Jordan Jeffries
Offender/respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Reference by Attorney General Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988 / Application for Leave to Refer Sentence as Unduly Lenient
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for burglary, intimidation, and breach of suspended sentence was unduly lenient under the relevant Sentencing Council guidelines.
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge correctly identified the appropriate categories for burglary and intimidation, considered aggravating and mitigating factors, and made reductions for totality within the permissible range. The sentence, though generous in some respects, was not unduly lenient and did not warrant interference on reference.
Court Disposition
Leave to refer sentence as unduly lenient refused.
Orders
- Application for leave to refer sentence as unduly lenient is refused.
- Restraining order in favour of Miss Stevenson for seven years remains in force.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment