African Export-Import Bank & Ors v Shebah Exploration & Production Company Ltd & Ors [2017] EWCA Civ 845 (28 June 2017)
The Facility Agreement was not made on the claimants' written standard terms of business because it was based on a negotiated LMA form with substantial amendments, and there was no evidence of habitual use of such terms by the claimants. Therefore, section 3 of the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 did not apply, and the exclusion of set-off and counterclaim was effective. The alleged oral standstill agreement was not binding as negotiations were subject to contract and no concluded agreement was reached.
- Citation
- [2017] EWCA Civ 845
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: AFRICAN EXPORT-IMPORT BANK; Respondent/claimant: DIAMOND BANK PLC; Respondent/claimant: SKYE BANK PLC; Appellant/defendant: SHEBAH EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION COMPANY LIMITED; Appellant/defendant: ALLENNE LIMITED; Appellant/defendant: DR AMBROSIE BRYANT CHUKWUELOKA ORJIAKO
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Judgment in the Commercial Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977, Standard Terms of Business, Summary Judgment, Set Off and Counterclaim, Syndicated Loan Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AFRICAN EXPORT-IMPORT BANK
Respondent/claimant
DIAMOND BANK PLC
Respondent/claimant
SKYE BANK PLC
Respondent/claimant
SHEBAH EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION COMPANY LIMITED
Appellant/defendant
ALLENNE LIMITED
Appellant/defendant
DR AMBROSIE BRYANT CHUKWUELOKA ORJIAKO
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Judgment in the Commercial Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Facility Agreement was made on the claimants' written standard terms of business within section 3 of the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977
- 2 Whether the defendants could set off alleged counterclaims against their liabilities under the Facility Agreement and Personal Guarantee
- 3 Whether the claimants breached an oral agreement not to commence proceedings pending negotiations with Zenith Bank
Ratio Decidendi
The Facility Agreement was not made on the claimants' written standard terms of business because it was based on a negotiated LMA form with substantial amendments, and there was no evidence of habitual use of such terms by the claimants. Therefore, section 3 of the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 did not apply, and the exclusion of set-off and counterclaim was effective. The alleged oral standstill agreement was not binding as negotiations were subject to contract and no concluded agreement was reached.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The Appellants shall pay the Respondents' costs of the appeal on the standard basis, to be assessed by detailed assessment if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment