Stronach v Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council [2001] EWCA Civ 573 (5 April 2001)

Stronach v Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council [2001] EWCA Civ 573 (5 April 2001)

The application for permission to appeal was dismissed because the applicant failed to demonstrate any arguable point of law or error in the tribunal's findings. The tribunal's refusal to extend time was within its discretion, the dismissal was due to incapability through ill health, and no reasonable adjustments could have enabled the claimant to return to work. There was no evidence of discrimination or victimisation.

Citation
[2001] EWCA Civ 573
Parties
Claimant/applicant: Trevor Stronach; Defendant/respondent: Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
05 April 2001
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Unfair Dismissal, Disability Discrimination, Race Discrimination, Trade Union Activities, Limitation Periods
Employment Law Discrimination Law Unfair Dismissal Disability Discrimination Race Discrimination Trade Union Activities Limitation Periods

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Trevor Stronach

Claimant/applicant

Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law in refusing to extend time for the first complaint
  2. 2 Whether the dismissal of the claimant was discriminatory on grounds of race, disability, or trade union activities
  3. 3 Whether the employer failed to make reasonable adjustments under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995

Ratio Decidendi

The application for permission to appeal was dismissed because the applicant failed to demonstrate any arguable point of law or error in the tribunal's findings. The tribunal's refusal to extend time was within its discretion, the dismissal was due to incapability through ill health, and no reasonable adjustments could have enabled the claimant to return to work. There was no evidence of discrimination or victimisation.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Permission to appeal refused