Hammond v International Network Services (UK) Ltd & Anor
The application for permission to appeal was refused because the allegations of bias were wholly unsustainable on the material before the court, the arguments advanced were not supported by evidence, and the application was extensively out of time without sufficient justification.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Eric Hammond; Defendant/respondent: International Network Services (UK) Ltd; Defendant/respondent: Thomas Kim
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 September 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Race Discrimination, Bias in Tribunal Proceedings, Extension of Time
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eric Hammond
Claimant/appellant
International Network Services (UK) Ltd
Defendant/respondent
Thomas Kim
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal proceedings were affected by actual or apparent bias
- 2 Whether there was justification for an extension of time to file the appeal
- 3 Whether the findings of fact by the Employment Tribunal were unsupported by evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The application for permission to appeal was refused because the allegations of bias were wholly unsustainable on the material before the court, the arguments advanced were not supported by evidence, and the application was extensively out of time without sufficient justification.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- Copy of transcript of judgment to appellant at public expense
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment