Chouafi v London United Busways Ltd.
The tribunal properly considered the medical evidence and the claimant's actions during the relevant period, and was entitled to conclude that the claimant had not established that it was not reasonably practicable or just and equitable to present the claim out of time. There was no error of law or perversity in the tribunal's decision.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Chouafi; Defendant/respondent: London United Busways Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Limitation Periods, Disability Discrimination, Extension of Time
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chouafi
Claimant/appellant
London United Busways Ltd
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law in refusing to extend time for presenting a claim for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination due to the claimant's medical condition
- 2 Whether the tribunal wrongly rejected uncontradicted medical evidence
- 3 Whether the absence of the claimant at the hearing was improperly weighed
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal properly considered the medical evidence and the claimant's actions during the relevant period, and was entitled to conclude that the claimant had not established that it was not reasonably practicable or just and equitable to present the claim out of time. There was no error of law or perversity in the tribunal's decision.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment